What Are The Themes Of The Book Terms Of Service
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling united states well-nigh the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
Terms of Service is a terrifying book to me in many ways.
I knew some of the pitfalls of the large networks like Facebook, simply I didn't know all of them. This volume changed the way that I view the portable devices t
Author Jacob Silverman digs deeply into various social media platforms and uncovers non only privacy violations only as well underlying attitudes adopted by the platform owners that point towards a future that is completely controlled past digital authorities watchdogs and technological elites.Terms of Service is a terrifying book to me in many ways.
I knew some of the pitfalls of the big networks like Facebook, but I didn't know all of them. This book changed the way that I view the portable devices that everyone carries around with them. Instead of helpful tools, I now come across that they can exist a spooky and impersonal form of command and surveillance, if we let them.
Terms of Service isn't all doom and gloom though. Silverman gives the reader innovative ways to buck the bland, over-sharing majority and examples of creative hackers and programmers who are doing just that.
He also suggests some sweeping societal changes within the government like a 20-start century Beak of Rights to address the troubles and privacy challenges of technology and a universal minimum wage to unlock the chains of digital serfdom.
Information technology'due south an exciting possible vision for the future. I wonder if nosotros volition e'er manage to do whatsoever of that.
This is the part of the review where I try to list read-alikes or books with a similar theme, but I think that Terms of Service is in a grade all of its own. I think parents, educators, politicians, and anyone who uses the internet should read and discuss this book.
It is merely through knowing the dangers of abiding connection that we tin can begin to address them. Terms of Service provides an eye-opening and disturbing view of how far we take let the situation go.
But, never fright, with proper education- like reading this book- anything is possible.
I received a costless advanced reader'southward re-create of this book through Goodreads Get-go Reads. FTC guidelines: bank check! And thanks for reading.
...more
Overview: Mr. Silverman is taking on the social media empire. Facebook, Twitter, Google+, no social media platform is allowed. There are quotes from the founders of these companies, equally well every bit Mr. Silverman'southward commentary virtually the media platforms themselves.
Likes: Mr. Silverman's warning over
I received this book equally role of the Goodreads Offset Reads Program for the purpose of a fair and honest review. As such, you may desire to stop now. Are you still with me? Well, don't say that I didn't warn you.Overview: Mr. Silverman is taking on the social media empire. Facebook, Twitter, Google+, no social media platform is allowed. At that place are quotes from the founders of these companies, also every bit Mr. Silverman's commentary about the media platforms themselves.
Likes: Mr. Silverman's warning over not posting everything from what you eat to your likes, dislikes, family unit etc, on your chosen social media platform is pretty accurate. It'southward likewise something that most should acknowledge anyway.
Dislikes: There was a lot of fear in this volume. Exist information technology what it may, the merely one yous can respond for, or hold accountable for what is posted on social media, is yourself. You can mitigate how the owners of such platforms use your information by merely non tying it into everything you own. There is no reason that Facebook, for example, should have a foot in your estimator, email, jail cell phone and some of the newer televisions and game decks.
Now this will be a viscid issue. If you savor it, rest assured that I am not taking whatever issue with you lot. My problem is with the 'Name and Shame' game that seems to exist so popular these days. It is just a way to make the one playing the game feel better at someone else's expense. Fifty-fifty if the person beingness 'named and shamed' did something absolutely reprehensible, making him or her the victim of the game does nothing to change his or her mental attitude, or mind. The game does naught to alter the circumstances of the state of affairs, nor does the victim hold with those doing the naming and shaming. Would y'all? I hope that those playing the game never say or do annihilation online that someone else will find offensive. After all, Mr. Silverman doesn't disagree with the game, just as long as the victims accept done something that he doesn't like.
Oh, 1 more matter before I go off of my soapbox. Overnight fame doesn't e'er atomic number 82 to depression or suicide. Those in the rescue professions e'er have to counterbalance the victories of those saved against the losses of those that they couldn't aid in time. Such topics must surely increase low in those circles.
Conclusion: There is an easy summary to this book. Sentinel what you put upwardly online. Information technology's kind of like 'streaking' if y'all will. At that place are some things that you just don't want public. Accept that the social media platforms are public places, and others volition exist getting involved. I don't believe we need more than governmental regulation in the social media circles, anymore than nosotros need it in the shopping malls or other gathering places for the masses. I hope you enjoy the volume.
...more
However, being a bit of a loner/introvert means that much of social media merely doesn't appeal and it never will. I was raised with a stiff, stubborn streak of
I feel lucky to be former plenty (53) to have lived without the cyberspace/social media AND to have experienced its ascension. To date, I am even so able to live on both sides of the divide: I take breaks from the net, don't utilise FB, Twitter, Instagram etc - yet easily adopt technologies that provide a clear do good (on line banking, shopping).Even so, being a bit of a loner/introvert ways that much of social media simply doesn't appeal and it never will. I was raised with a strong, stubborn streak of independent thinking. Therefore, what a stranger thinks of my photos, life, personality, etc...just doesn't concern me. This book pointed out that some people don't get this option, every bit their sonogram images were uploaded to FB before their birth - having a digital self thrust upon them in the uterus. THIS one fact made the most impression on me over annihilation else in this book. No wonder young people are obsessed with what other's think - they were born into this paradigm.
The one down side to this book is that this author makes what is, for me, a real pet peeve. Similar nearly journalists, they find individuals to profile to illustrate their points and brand their argument. In an effort to drum up sympathy from the reader, this author overshoots the mark and chooses to profile people that are their own worst enemies due to their stupid choices - I didn't see these people every bit victims of social media and the digital life. In other words: the people profiled are not very bright nor perceptive. For instance: the immature woman hoping to "brand it" in NYC that moved from Texas. Never mind that thousands of youth have flocked to NYC (and other major cities) since there were such cities to "make information technology" in some kind of arts/media/music that is highly, highly competitive. Honey, moving back to Texas to regroup is not a failure. Or the guy that was the global warming blogger, feeling overwhelmed past how hard he had to work 24/7. LEARN Nearly BOUNDARIES! Jesus, dude, if you can't prepare boundaries in your work I doubtable you can't set them in other areas of your life either.
Like the pre-digital era, life is tough for the gullible, the stupid, and those that permit life "happen" to them. I simply wish the author had spend more fourth dimension profiling people who were victims of doxxing, etc..people who are truly screwed by digital spiral ups.
Overall, I would recommend the book. And be glad if you are carper with a tight hold on your wallet - I chuckled the whole way through the book at the very thought that a company tin get me to buy crap I don't need with mere pop up ads. Lightheaded corporation - don't y'all know you I don't buy things unless I actually need them and without some thought?
...more
Silverman's description of, and understanding of, social media is excellent, but that's only function of what we need. After p. 205 I lost interest, though I finally skipped ahead to the conclusion and found that he had nothing in item to recommend. He does at least briefly explore several possibilities. He explores those who cutting themselves off from social media, either partially or entirely. Just jettisoning the net and social media isn't the answer, evidently, but what is? Another possibility is "subverting" the internet by posting anonymously or giving misleading information as to your "likes." A third is just posting without regard to what the public (or the government, or advertisers) think nearly y'all.
Writing intelligently about this subject area, I call back, requires more considered research into the psychology and sociology of the cyberspace. My thinking is that this is a vast and complex subject and will crave many smart people to piece of work together to sympathise it. In the meantime, we face a bunch of problems (similar climate change and Donald Trump) that are not directly related to social media, merely which are being distorted by social media. I don't heed reading or talking about internet issues, but I recall we need someone to admit that nosotros actually don't know what's happening to united states of america or to do the serious research and thought. In the meantime, our experiments with not-truth are expanding, Donald Trump is President, and nosotros're on our ain. Facebook doesn't accept the reply, either.
...more
...more
Like many people my historic period, I've started to see the unpleasant sides of a society addicted to social media. However, my thoughts and dissatisfactions were scattered and listless. Then comes "Terms of Service"— a nuanced, all-compassing meditation on the "price of constant connection".
But, like many of the social media networks that I employ, this volume had some unpleasant "Terms of Service" itself.
There were some unexpectedly memorable passages, including this beautiful I plant this book just in fourth dimension.
Like many people my age, I've started to meet the unpleasant sides of a society fond to social media. Nevertheless, my thoughts and dissatisfactions were scattered and listless. So comes "Terms of Service"— a nuanced, all-compassing meditation on the "price of constant connexion".
Just, like many of the social media networks that I use, this volume had some unpleasant "Terms of Service" itself.
At that place were some unexpectedly memorable passages, including this beautiful clarification of netizens "tending to their profiles, niggling gardens of personality in which only pleasantries blossom and life'south setbacks, fifty-fifty a death in the family unit, are presented with such overwrought sentimentality that it'due south possible to think that such tragedies are welcomed, because they offer an opportunity to share and be embraced by the social media cocoon." (46)
Wow.
(I had to reread that sentence four times— twice just to unpack it, twice to appreciate it.)
Yet this quote in itself presents some of the flaws in Silverman's meditation. 1) It's chaotic, nigh unorganized. 2) Its apocalyptic tone is grating. iii) It'south quite repetitive, and content is often built on assumptions. 4) About irritating of all, it's self-flagellating, "a point which I'll get to afterwards." (182)
ane) Arrangement
Silverman is quite practiced at bringing up nuanced arguments about the downsides of social media. Each chapter starts out strong, elicits questions, and catches your attention. However, by the time yous're a dozen pages in, your eyes begin to unfocus. At that point, most of the clarity and confidence has dissolved into roundabout arguments and anecdotal evidence. I skimmed a lot of the midsections.
ii) TONE
While at that place was some endeavor at restraint, the book still oozed some very stiff, very negative opinions almost social media. It presents itself as a reality bank check...but for the entire 400 some pages. It really wears down on the curious reader after a while.
three) REPETITION
Aye, Silverman is quite good at bringing up nuanced arguments. The problem is, the nuance is sometimes lost since the testify tended to exist repetitive. Perhaps that is the nature of the evidence itself, simply that doesn't change the fact that "Terms of Service" was written with the assumption that every single social media user overshares, overuses, and overlooks. Everyone is Facebook's "ideal user"— the type to thought-vomit on statuses and put every single life consequence online. Out of the several hundred friends I take on Facebook, there are exactly two people I tin can think of who practise that. In brusk, the book exaggerates its assumptions to make itself more of import.
four) UGH
"A point which I'll get to later." This phrase was used several times in the volume. This phrase was as well the bane of my existence while I was reading. This phrase too shows exactly how unorganized this book can be at times, and how self-important the book sounded.
So.
I actually highly recommend reading this book. It's extremely thought-provoking and interesting. It's kind of similar taking really biting preventative medicine. Yous know you should do it, merely you regret it afterward because of the feel.
...more than
Silverman besides hits each of the big data/social media companies, particularly Facebook and Google, hard, and occasionally offers some critique of the cyber-libertarian, who believes that if government only got out of the way, the technology would bring almost a utopian event [ironic, as Silverman notes, every bit the Net resulted itself from government intervention and that amount of cooperation that takes place betwixt tech companies and the regime for mod surveillance].
While the book reads well, and offers interesting and timely information, I felt disappointed in Silverman's "suggestions" for how to respond to the electric current state of things. His idea for "civil disobedience" seemed more than likely to embrace the spread of "fake news" that is ubiqituous now and unproblematic shenanigans with websites and media, rather than any tools to preserve your ain privacy or authenticity, or sustained effort to change the present status quo.
...more
This volume would be amend served to accept focused more on why we should care. Considering the frequent drumming of: privacy is our correct and we are consumers and producers, we are selling ourselves for free to tech companies, we are our own bondage kind of rhetoric is all well and good, but largely ineffective of no real solution is presented. And I think this is where the jaded function comes in. I know all this stuff, simply I find it hard to care that much. Maybe my tolerance for social media has however to reach disquisitional mass.
I did detect information technology ironic that I was reading this during the data sharing controversy regarding Facebook and Cambridge Analytics, only even that, showing real life justification for the points this volume are making, has yet to prove any decline in Facebook's user count or revenue stream. I call back nigh people, myself included, take a nihilistic outlook on the relationship between our social media usage and the visitor backside them. ...more
At times the tone gets polemical, even apocalyptic, and there are counterarguments to be addressed that aren't (the Internet does even so offer opportunities for meaningful identity play - fandom culture being the highlight - although they're becoming rather rare) but the essential statement
The nonfiction cousin of Dave Eggers' "The Circle," this volume argues that social media turns ourselves and our world into a serial of panopticons — to the do good of capital and the detriment of everything else.At times the tone gets polemical, even apocalyptic, and at that place are counterarguments to be addressed that aren't (the Internet does still offer opportunities for meaningful identity play - fandom culture being the highlight - although they're becoming rather rare) but the essential arguments are on point and highly relevant.
...more
That being said, I don't regret reading information technology because he and then finer nails the cringe-worthy aspects of cocky-promotion and identify cultivation on
I actually actually enjoyed this book, but the farther I got into it, the fact it was over v years old became more and more axiomatic. This is ironic since 1 of his arguments is that social media had increased our demand for immediacy and newness. It's simply that tech is a fast-changing globe and some of what the author was discussing is no longer around.That being said, I don't regret reading information technology considering he so effectively nails the cringe-worthy aspects of self-promotion and identify cultivation on social media. It has definitely inspired me to learn more and change my means.
...more
This is my first read reaction:
I promise I volition get a gamble to do a more than in depth read, only I will definitely be adding this book to my drove for further usage.
"By Google's definition, the world'south data also includes our relationships, our likes and dislikes, our feelings, what we share with friends, the due east-mails nosotros send, the videos we upload, the sentiments implicitly expressed past our browsing habits. Why wouldn't they do everything they can to try to organize that, too?"
Anything we enter into a website to use various services offered by many sites becomes a part of a vast network of information which includes your personal profile. It shouldn't surprise anyone that the unabridged appliance is used to sell you more than stuff. In such a way, we become complicit as the very agents who construction data for companies to apply at their whim. The more than nosotros disembalm about ourselves, the the more useful our profile!
Silverman not only tackles the logistics of these services, simply examines the civilisation of "honesty and transparency" which is instrumental in helping build these data profiles. This seems paradoxical, only the paradox is resolved when we understand that it is informed by a greatly overblown atomistic Randian individualism. In one case again, I am reminded of Toyama's thesis of technology equally an amplifier rather than a democratizer. In this sense, ICTs and other contempo technological tools have but served to amplify our consumerism and individualistic gild.
The author does not stop here. He also examines the reified nature of viral information information whose relevance or importance as a slice of information is quantifiably measured by its click-thru number. Gone are the days of information being tied to educational framework—numbers are our new god, for we obviously assume they can speak for themselves.
In the spirit of reified data, much of what passes for news in what Silverman calls "churnalism" which has a very cynical point of view of its audience, understanding traditional news sources and formats as too sophisticated for its readership. Tactics employed are less based on informing the reader of the issue at hand, but for maximizing its click-thrus, a way of quantifying data thereby accumulating a relevance cistron. Tactics such as marvel-gap headlines where a provocative headline accompanies a photograph to entice the reader to click often simply open up up to a wire photo accompanied by a couple of sentences. In the terminate, the reader benefits piffling. The website on the other mitt not only receives another empty striking to return its content more than popular, but big data companies gain knowledge of your click-thru history, and so that they tin more finer apply your tastes for more than constructive marketing strategies.
Let's call back nigh this—anyone who touts the net every bit a place of varying viewpoints on an equal playing field must surely take a step dorsum and recall. Tendencies which privilege stockholder interests that may influence search results and content can only go more than entrenched from here if the current logic of numbers and profits over people continues to win out. These companies, afterwards all, are not providing a mere public service. Tin a user's horizons be expanded if the content turned up in a search has the user'due south search history and preferences built in to the algorithm? Won't biases simply exist reinforced with an aim to sell more crap?
Silverman spares no details—the ascension of the shared economy through Uber, Lyft and Taskrabbit are as well put under the lens. Essentially, Silverman points out that what is shared near among participants in the sharing economy is run a risk—risk that the platform owners displace onto workers and customers. I couldn't possibly put information technology better when he said,
"[...] the sharing economy isn't some fairer, communitarian system of barter and exchange. It more accurately resembles an farthermost class of capitalism in which everyone is an entrepreneur simply no one is employed."
And so much is covered in this book, I definitely haven't covered it all in this review. It'due south the volume I accept been hoping to find. It'south a book I hope you'll read. Anyway, I gotta go. I'll leave you with this dreadful forecast for the future,
"Google already guides the routes I take when traveling. Perhaps, they'll determine to offset directing me past restaurants that annunciate with them and locations featuring billboards with their pay-per-gaze technology. Every bit I pass these restaurants, I might receive ads or coupons in my Gmail inbox offering me a discount. Along the way, my entire urban experience potentially comes nether the influence Google."
Oh, and he'due south a Jeopardy champion past the way. I didn't know this when I began the book. ;)
...more
A college student blogs about her sex life, peradventure believing that her readers will be people like herself and her peers, and is harassed by an anonymous creep or grouping of creeps. The police won't do anything about information technology and the blogger retires. Years pass, yet when people google her proper name she still appears as a sexual activity blogger.
A man is arrested (just not bedevilled). His arrest would accept been public information in the past but information technology would have been hard for anyone to find out about it. Now his mugshot appears in web searches. The mugshot site offers to remove the mugshot if he pays hundreds of dollars, which he does, but the mugshot then appears on other sites, and more payoffs are required.
An insurance company denies a woman's claim that she'southward clinically depressed based on her happy-looking vacation photos posted on social media. The vacation was recommended by her doctor as a way to fight depression.
Walter Benjamin is quoted, "late" capitalism is assumed, California libertarianism is blamed. San Francisco (concluding Republican mayor: 1964) is pricing out working people and is abode to Airbnb. An Indian immigrant tin can't discover an acceptable chore in New York then she takes on picayune errands and chores for people she connects with on a social media platform. She is then employed on a regular footing as a personal banana by i of these people, who is affluent, hardworking and decorated. What was the point of this story? Damned if y'all practice, damned if you don't?
Hundreds of pages in and, incredibly, information technology seems that the author has no intention of withdrawing from the social media platforms he frequents. He suggests fighting back in various ways, such as pranks and "culture jamming"; pretend yous have children when you don't, habiliment a mask in photos, etc.
(I got an accelerate reader re-create of this volume.)
...more
One of the best takeaways from Silverman:
John Steinbeck said that poor Americans see themselves every bit
"temporarily embarrassed millionaires." In the same fashion,
today's Americans tend to see themselves every bit unrecognized
famous people.
And so the real question is what are we all trying to get out of all this sharing? The Internet, as it exist today, is a huge sounding board for our egos. Anonymity is anathema, and unless our every idea/mood/behavior isn't broadcast immediately information technology risks being undervalued or worse - not having taken place at all.
Of grade, most of readers finding their mode to this book won't be completely surprised by all its revelations. These are the exact reasons I abhorred near social media for quite a few years. So why did I all of a sudden experience the need to hop back on board? Let me call up nigh that as I post this review to Goodreads, which re-posts it to my personal blog and re-links to my Google+, and is automatically added to my Facebook update feed. That way I am sure this very important review certainly happened!
...more than
Goodreads is hiring!
Acquire more »
Related Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while nosotros sign yous in to your Goodreads business relationship.
What Are The Themes Of The Book Terms Of Service,
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22328543-terms-of-service
Posted by: wisefeseracke.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Are The Themes Of The Book Terms Of Service"
Post a Comment